OPEN CFDA 10.219 ↗ Mandatory Grant Hard ~100h to apply

Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program

🏛 National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA)

⏰ Deadline
Jul 13, 2026 in 22 days
💰 Award amount
$25K – $650K
📊 Total program funding
$5M
🎯 Expected awards
7 recipients
📍 Scope
National

Can you apply?

This grant is for research and educational institutions studying ecological effects of genetically engineered organisms. Public or private institutions conducting research on GE plants, animals, microorganisms, and arthropods may apply. The program funds risk assessment research to support federal regulatory decision-making. No cost-sharing is required.

Eligible applicants
Check your eligibility — what type of organization are you?

Program description

The purpose of the BRAG program, Assistance Listing 10.219, is to support the generation of new information that will assist Federal regulatory agencies in making science-based decisions about the ecological effects of introducing genetically engineered (GE) organisms by techniques that use recombinant, synthesized, or amplified nucleic acids to modify or create a genome. The organisms include plants, microorganisms (including fungi, bacteria, and viruses), arthropods, fish, birds, livestock, and other animals. These include related wild and agricultural organisms.

Who can apply

Eligible applicants

How to apply

Application links

Key dates & requirements

  • 📄 Narrative page limit: 18 pages
  • Project period: 30 months
  • 🏢 Indirect cost cap: 30%. Indirect rates explained →
  • 📨 Letter of Intent due: Jul 1, 2026

Required documents

  • SF-424 (Application for Federal Assistance)
  • Project Narrative (research design and methods)
  • Budget and Budget Justification
  • Curriculum vitae for key personnel
  • Letters of support or collaboration agreements

Program contact

Funding track record

Recent awards under CFDA 10.219 from the last 3 years — real organizations that won funding through this same program.

70
awards (3 yrs)
$34M
total funded
34
unique recipients
$485K
average award

Top 10 Largest Recent Awards

  1. $650,000
  2. $650,000
  3. $650,000
  4. $650,000
  5. $649,999
  6. $649,998
  7. $649,996
  8. $649,929
  9. $649,916
  10. $649,847

Top States by Funding

  • MD 7 awards $3.9M
  • TX 6 awards $3.1M
  • NC 7 awards $2.8M
  • OR 4 awards $2.3M
  • CA 5 awards $1.8M

Source: USAspending.gov — federal spending transparency. Data covers last 3 years.

Funding history

Annual funding for this program — Federal obligations (CFDA 10.219). How funding has trended year over year.

2024 $5,283,132
2025 $3,612,085
2026 est. $5,000,000

FAQ

Who is eligible to apply for the BRAG program?

Public or private research institutions and educational organizations are eligible. Government agencies and individuals are not eligible.

What types of organisms are covered by this grant?

Research may focus on genetically engineered plants, microorganisms, arthropods, fish, birds, livestock, and other animals. Related wild and agricultural organisms are also included.

What is the funding range?

Awards typically range from $25,000 to $650,000. Total program funding is $5 million annually.

What should my research focus on?

The program prioritizes science-based risk assessment research on ecological effects of GE organisms. Work should support federal regulatory decision-making processes.

Is cost-sharing required?

No. Cost-sharing is not required for this program.

💡 Tips for applicants

  • Align your research question directly with federal regulatory needs. Show how findings will inform policy decisions.
  • Emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility. Reviewers expect robust experimental design and clear methodology.
  • Address ecological effects explicitly. General biotechnology research without environmental focus is unlikely to be competitive.
  • Partner with regulatory agencies if possible. Collaboration strengthens applications by ensuring relevance to agency decision-making.
  • Document your institution's capacity for research compliance. Include evidence of laboratory certifications and biosafety protocols.

⚠️ Common mistakes

Applications lack clear connection to federal regulatory decision-making. Research that is interesting scientifically but not policy-relevant will not score well. Vague descriptions of ecological effects or inadequate risk assessment methodology are common rejections.

Similar grants

22 days left Jul 13, 2026
Apply →