OPEN CFDA 93.242 ↗ Competitive Grant Competitive ~100h typical effort

Innovative Pilot Mental Health Services Research Not Involving Clinical Trials (R34 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

🏛 National Institutes of Health (HHS-NIH11)

✓ Free, no account · Source: Grants.gov · Last verified Jul 16, 2026

⏰ Deadline
Jan 7, 2028 in 539 days
💰 Award amount
up to $225K
📊 Total program funding
$225K
📍 Scope
International

Can you apply?

This grant is for researchers and institutions developing innovative mental health services approaches without conducting clinical trials. Eligible applicants include universities, research institutions, nonprofits, and government agencies with research capacity. Projects must focus on mental health service delivery models, implementation science, or service evaluation. Funding supports early-stage pilot projects that generate preliminary data for future larger grants.

Eligible applicants
Check your eligibility — what type of organization are you?

Not the right fit? Find grants for your organization in 5 questions →

Program description

The purpose of this Notice of Funding Announcement (NOFO) is to encourage pilot research that is not an immediate precursor to testing a service intervention but is consistent with NIMH priorities for services research. While NIMH now requires use of an experimental therapeutics model for all intervention studies, there is recognition that some mission-relevant areas of services research do not involve clinical trials.

Who can apply

Eligible applicants

Demographic focus

How to apply

Application links

Required documents

  • SF-424 (R&R) application form
  • Project narrative (research strategy section)
  • Budget and budget justification
  • Biographical sketches of key personnel
  • Letters of support from partner organizations
  • Institutional review board or human subjects approval documentation

Program contact

Funding track record

Recent awards under CFDA 93.242 from the last 3 years — real organizations that won funding through this same program.

58
awards (3 yrs)
$1.6B
total funded
37
unique recipients
$27.3M
average award

Top 10 Largest Recent Awards

  1. $78,262,050
  2. $75,056,208
  3. $74,756,329
  4. $64,705,159
  5. $63,991,707
  6. $54,214,022
  7. $48,653,752
  8. $38,895,082
  9. $38,475,557
  10. $35,940,675

Top States by Funding

  • CA 15 awards $408.1M
  • MA 9 awards $230.5M
  • NY 6 awards $184.2M
  • CT 4 awards $183.5M
  • WA 4 awards $174.9M

Source: USAspending.gov — federal spending transparency. Data covers last 3 years.

Funding history

Annual funding for this program — Federal obligations (CFDA 93.242). How funding has trended year over year.

2024 $1,722,300,004
2025 $1,726,864,191
2026 est. $99,221,272

FAQ

Who can apply for this grant?

Universities, research institutions, 501(c)(3) nonprofits, and state/local governments with research infrastructure are eligible. Applicants must have institutional review board capacity and research experience.

What types of projects are funded?

Innovative mental health service delivery models, implementation research, and pilot service evaluation projects. Clinical trials are explicitly not allowed.

What is the typical funding level?

R34 grants typically fund early-stage pilot projects. Actual amounts vary; check the funding opportunity announcement for current ranges.

What are the chances of being funded?

NIH typically funds 15-25% of R34 applications. Competitiveness depends on innovation, team qualifications, and feasibility.

When are deadlines?

Standard NIH deadlines are typically January, May, and September. Check specific opportunity for exact dates and submission windows.

💡 Tips for applicants

  • Start with a clear, specific mental health service problem your innovation addresses. Vague proposals are rejected quickly.
  • Build a multidisciplinary team with mental health expertise, research methods skills, and implementation experience.
  • Show preliminary data or feasibility evidence even though this is a pilot. Strong preliminary work significantly improves competitiveness.
  • Focus on service delivery innovation, not just research design. Reviewers want real-world applicability.
  • Budget conservatively and align costs directly to pilot activities. Reviewers scrutinize R34 budgets for efficiency.

⚠️ Common mistakes

Proposing clinical trials or drug/device studies will result in automatic rejection. Lacking institutional research infrastructure or proper oversight shows poor planning. Insufficient preliminary data or overly ambitious scope makes pilots seem unfeasible.

Similar grants

539 days left Jan 7, 2028
Apply →